Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an urgent and important priority for the U.S. military. We have evidence-based treatments that work for many people with PTSD, which include prolonged exposure therapy and cognitive processing therapy, among others. But some who undergo these treatments do not achieve remission, and some are unwilling to participate in or drop out of these treatments. For a number of reasons, service members experiencing PTSD may be looking for alternatives to the existing evidence-based treatments for PTSD. Maybe they tried one of these treatments and didn’t feel that it worked for them. Maybe the idea of one-on-one weekly therapy is daunting or just unpleasant.
There are a number of complementary and alternative therapies proposed for PTSD that do have emerging evidence, though not all of it is promising. And there are a large number of treatments that show up in the media that have no research whatsoever to stand on. Evidence-based treatments aren’t flashy or sexy, and the media often highlight novel treatments that may not be considered treatments at all. Some of the more out-there treatments for PTSD covered by the media in recent months include: sweat lodge vision quests, therapeutic fishing, parrot husbandry, and shark dive therapy.
Articles covering these treatments often feature anecdotes of individuals with PTSD whose lives have been greatly improved. While these stories can be heartwarming, it is important to realize that, without evidence, there is no basis for suggesting that the same experience will be true of others who seek out these same experiences.
Many of these proposed treatments are activities or experiences that any individual can participate in, many of which involve the outdoors (e.g. “wilderness therapy”), animal interaction (e.g. “wolf therapy”), or adrenaline highs (e.g. skydiving). Other treatments covered in the media that lack an evidence-base are created by individuals or groups that advertise via a website, often charging money for how-to manuals, devices, or for receiving the treatment itself. These websites can be misleading, as the treatments appear to have been developed by reputable clinicians, and the websites may include testimonials and depict “studies” that appear to be published research, but are not (or, if they are published, they are often low quality studies published in low impact journals).
It is important to critically evaluate what you read online. While novel treatments that you may encounter in the news may sound exciting and promise a quick fix, remember that these treatments have not been properly examined.
Hopefully you are keeping up with our PHCoE Psych Health Evidence Briefs which provide scientific evidence and clinical guidance for treatment topics chosen by our blog readers and website users. In an effort to respond to requests for evidence briefs on unsubstantiated treatments, we have created a place to identify treatments for which there is no research evidence. In the future, when evidence brief topics with no evidence are submitted, our team will conduct a search to ensure that no research studies exist, and then we will add these to our list. You can find the list on the Treatments with No Evidence page – come back often, as the list will be updated any time one of these is identified and of course the list will be revised as well if one develops an evidence base, such that we can produce an evidence brief.
For submitted topics that have research evidence, we’ll continue to release new briefs every few months, including the latest set on biofeedback for posttraumatic stress disorder, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depressive disorder and client-centered therapy for major depressive disorder.
Ms. Erin Beech is a contracted senior research associate at the Psychological Health Center of Excellence. She has a master’s degree in psychology and has expertise in evidence synthesis and is responsible for drafting the Psych Health Evidence Briefs.
The views expressed in Clinician's Corner blogs are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Psychological Health Center of Excellence or Department of Defense.